Chapter 4 Evaluating Homeschooling Outcomes: A Review of Key Studies Add to Default shortcuts

Chapter 4 Evaluating Homeschooling Outcomes: A Review of Key Studies Add to Default shortcuts
(The image comes from this NHERI's article.)

📖 Rudner 1999

In 1998, Dr. Lawrence M. Rudner conducted a non-randomized study focusing on homeschooled students who utilized Bob Jones University (BJU) curriculum and testing services. While the study reported high academic achievement among these students, Rudner explicitly cautioned against generalizing these results to the broader homeschooling population due to the sample's lack of representativeness. The study primarily reflected outcomes for a specific, privileged subset of homeschoolers and did not account for diverse demographics, including high schoolers, children of color, or those from lower-income families. (Mackinac CenterCoalition for Responsible Home Education)

📊 Ray 2010

Brian D. Ray of the National Home Education Research Institute (NHERI) published a nationwide study in 2010 examining the academic achievement and demographic traits of homeschool students. The study found that homeschooled students scored, on average, 15 to 30 percentile points above public-school students on standardized academic achievement tests. However, critics have noted that the study's sample may have been skewed towards families with higher income and education levels, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings. (NHERINHERI)

🇨🇦 Martin-Chang et al. 2011 (Canada)

A Canadian study by Sandra Martin-Chang and colleagues in 2011 sought to address sampling biases by matching homeschooled children with public school counterparts from similar socioeconomic backgrounds. The study differentiated between "structured" homeschoolers, who followed organized lesson plans, and "unstructured" homeschoolers. Findings indicated that structured homeschoolers outperformed public school students, while unstructured homeschoolers scored lower than both groups. (educacaodomiciliar.fe.unicamp.brResearchGate)

📝 SAT Performance: Belfield 2001

Economist Clive Belfield analyzed 2001 SAT data, revealing that homeschooled students had an average score of 1093.1. This was approximately 80.5 points higher than the public school average and 37.5 points above the private religious school average, but 30.7 points below the private independent school average. After adjusting for socioeconomic factors, homeschooled students still scored 38.6 points above expectations, particularly excelling in the verbal section. (Coalition for Responsible Home EducationUnconventional31)

📈 ACT Performance

According to ACT data, homeschooled students consistently outperform their public school peers. From 2001 to 2019, homeschooled students' average ACT composite scores ranged from 22.3 to 22.8, compared to the national average of approximately 21. In 2023, the average ACT score for homeschooled students was 22.8, while the national average was 19.9. (ACTminingjournal.net)


🧠 Key Takeaways

  1. Potential for High Achievement: Homeschooling can lead to strong academic outcomes, especially when instruction is structured and resources are adequate.
  2. Variability Based on Structure: Structured homeschooling approaches tend to yield better academic results compared to unstructured methods.
  3. Influence of Socioeconomic Factors: Studies often reflect higher achievement among homeschoolers from more affluent and educated families, suggesting that socioeconomic status plays a significant role.
  4. College Performance: Homeschooled students who attend college generally perform well academically, with some studies indicating higher GPAs compared to their peers from traditional schooling backgrounds.

🔗 Further Resources

For more comprehensive information on homeschooling outcomes, visit the Coalition for Responsible Home Education's research summaries:

👉 Homeschool Outcomes – CRHE

Read more

7月10日 诗篇8:1-9 箴言 18:23-24

7月10日 诗篇8:1-9 箴言 18:23-24

English 1. 当你读到“耶和华我们的主啊,你的名在全地何其美!”(《诗篇》8:1,9)时,心中浮现出什么情感?当你感到渺小或不堪重负时,默想神的威严如何帮助你更新情绪? 2. 你认为大卫为何对神竟“顾念”人类并“眷顾”他们(《诗篇》8:4)感到如此惊奇?对神关怀的意识如何重塑你对自身价值的看法? 3. 《诗篇》8:2提到婴孩和吃奶的因着神设立了能力。这节经文如何挑战人们对权力与影响力的普遍观念?又如何安慰一个感到沮丧或不自信的心? 4. 根据《诗篇》8:6–8,神将管理万物的权柄赐给人类。当你情绪低落、感到自己微不足道时,这个崇高的呼召如何影响你对人生使命的理解? 5. 《诗篇》中所表达的谦卑,与当今社会常见的自我宣传形成怎样的对比?当你拥抱谦卑的态度时,这如何帮助你恢复情绪的平衡与内心的安息? 6. 《箴言》18:23中提到穷人用恳求的话说话,

By cislyu
7月9日 诗篇7; 箴言18:22

7月9日 诗篇7; 箴言18:22

English 1. 大卫将自己的案件交托给神的审判台。在你生命中,哪些情况是你现在需要交托给神,而不是继续情绪化地反复思考的?(请思考大卫是如何面对恐惧、不公与愤怒的,这对我们今天的情绪健康有何启示?) 2. 在《诗篇》7:1–2中,大卫为何立刻转向神寻求庇护,而不是自己动手解决问题?这教导我们当感到压迫或受冤时,应当首先转向谁? 3. 根据《诗篇》7:3–5,大卫愿意让神察验他。这揭示了他怎样的正直品格与对神公义的信靠?你愿意被神这样察验吗? 4. 在《诗篇》7:6–11中,神的性情被如何描述?尤其是在祂如何审判恶人和义人方面? 5. 《诗篇》7:11说,“神是义的审判者,又是天天向恶人发怒的神。”我们如何调和神每日向恶人发怒这一点与祂的慈爱与忍耐? 6. 大卫如何从哀求转向在《诗篇》7:17中的赞美?你认为敬拜能否改变我们的情绪状态? 7.

By cislyu