Chapter 7 Common Education Philosophies and Their Key Characteristics

Chapter 7 Common Education Philosophies and Their Key Characteristics
Classical Edu

中文版

Perennialism / Eternalism / Realism (“Classical” Education):
This educational philosophy emphasizes teaching and learning the classic works of humanity that have stood the test of time—such as those by Homer, Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Shakespeare, and others.

  • Primary Goal: Students develop critical thinking and analytical skills in the process of learning knowledge and truth.
  • Core Concept: Focuses on core subjects like reading, writing, math, history, and science.
  • Teaching Characteristics: Emphasize the three stages of learning, grammar, logic, and rhetoric. Each stage focuses on different contents and learning methods.

("Classical" education has been growing in popularity in recent years, both in the U.S. and in Christian circles in China. However, as people implement the "ideal", there arises some questions that need to be addressed, which I'll talk about later. It's quite interesting!)

  • Pros and Cons:
    • Pros: Children trained in this way often have strong humanistic literacy.
    • Cons: It requires a lot of reading, which may not be suitable for children with special needs.

Essentialism (Idealism + Realism):
This philosophy emphasizes that children should learn traditional core subjects, and that learning should be thorough and rigorous. A key figure is William Bagley (1874–1946).

  • Primary Goal: To ensure the general public receives foundational training in basic knowledge.
  • Core Concept: Emphasizes grade-level-appropriate core academic subjects, presented in a systematic and structured way.
  • Teaching Characteristics: Includes direct instruction and explanation, along with tests and exams. Public school education is generally based on this model. Homeschooling families that adopt this philosophy typically focus on core subjects in the morning and arts or physical education in the afternoon. It’s often easier for new homeschooling families to start with this approach.
  • Pros and Cons:
    • Pros: Organized and systematic learning.
    • Cons: Often lacks depth and does not encourage imagination or critical thinking.

Romanticism (Idealism):
This philosophy emphasizes learning through inner intuition and achieving a peaceful state of self-awareness—knowing who you are, your role in society, and so on. It strongly emphasizes self-knowledge. A representative thinker is Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778).

  • Primary Goal: To help students achieve their own self-education goals.
  • Core Concept: The 5 “I”s — Imagination, Intuition, Individuality, Idealism, and Inspiration.
  • Teaching Characteristics: Most who adopt the "unschooling" approach (as the author calls it) hold to this philosophy. This approach is the opposite of structured “homeschooling”—there are no assignments, no fixed curriculum, no tests. The learner takes full ownership of their education.
  • Pros and Cons:
    • Pros: Allows children to deeply explore topics they’re passionate about. Very suitable for older children or those with giftedness and intrinsic motivation.
    • Cons: Difficult to manage, especially when the children are young.

Progressivism (Pragmatism):
This philosophy believes that progress and change are essential to successful education. A key figure is John Dewey (1859–1952).

  • Primary Goal: To help students develop the ability to manage tasks, solve problems, and overcome challenges.
  • Core Concept:
    1. Education must be personalized to be meaningful.
    2. Learning is inseparable from life.
  • Teaching Characteristics:
    1. Emphasizes children’s abilities, strengths, and interests.
    2. Values the power of experimentation and uses discussion and dialogue to assess learning.
    3. Emphasizes collaborative learning in groups.
  • Pros and Cons:
    • Pros: Focus on progress/steps of learning.
    • Cons: Can easily lead to utilitarianism.

In fact, these educational philosophies are not mutually exclusive—there is overlap and integration among them. It’s easy to see that Classical Education emphasizes the content of learning, while Romanticism and Progressivism emphasize goals, and Essentialism focuses more on the methods of the learning process.

Read more

7月10日 诗篇8:1-9 箴言 18:23-24

7月10日 诗篇8:1-9 箴言 18:23-24

English 1. 当你读到“耶和华我们的主啊,你的名在全地何其美!”(《诗篇》8:1,9)时,心中浮现出什么情感?当你感到渺小或不堪重负时,默想神的威严如何帮助你更新情绪? 2. 你认为大卫为何对神竟“顾念”人类并“眷顾”他们(《诗篇》8:4)感到如此惊奇?对神关怀的意识如何重塑你对自身价值的看法? 3. 《诗篇》8:2提到婴孩和吃奶的因着神设立了能力。这节经文如何挑战人们对权力与影响力的普遍观念?又如何安慰一个感到沮丧或不自信的心? 4. 根据《诗篇》8:6–8,神将管理万物的权柄赐给人类。当你情绪低落、感到自己微不足道时,这个崇高的呼召如何影响你对人生使命的理解? 5. 《诗篇》中所表达的谦卑,与当今社会常见的自我宣传形成怎样的对比?当你拥抱谦卑的态度时,这如何帮助你恢复情绪的平衡与内心的安息? 6. 《箴言》18:23中提到穷人用恳求的话说话,

By cislyu
7月9日 诗篇7; 箴言18:22

7月9日 诗篇7; 箴言18:22

English 1. 大卫将自己的案件交托给神的审判台。在你生命中,哪些情况是你现在需要交托给神,而不是继续情绪化地反复思考的?(请思考大卫是如何面对恐惧、不公与愤怒的,这对我们今天的情绪健康有何启示?) 2. 在《诗篇》7:1–2中,大卫为何立刻转向神寻求庇护,而不是自己动手解决问题?这教导我们当感到压迫或受冤时,应当首先转向谁? 3. 根据《诗篇》7:3–5,大卫愿意让神察验他。这揭示了他怎样的正直品格与对神公义的信靠?你愿意被神这样察验吗? 4. 在《诗篇》7:6–11中,神的性情被如何描述?尤其是在祂如何审判恶人和义人方面? 5. 《诗篇》7:11说,“神是义的审判者,又是天天向恶人发怒的神。”我们如何调和神每日向恶人发怒这一点与祂的慈爱与忍耐? 6. 大卫如何从哀求转向在《诗篇》7:17中的赞美?你认为敬拜能否改变我们的情绪状态? 7.

By cislyu